Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sadredin Moosavi's avatar

This is very true. It must be noted, however, that faculty have a large role in hiring their peers and enabling peers whose conduct is inappropriate for the positions they hold. Administrators are part of the problem, but the reality is that the faculty as a group bear primarily responsibility for this situation.

Expand full comment
Eric Roth's avatar

Thank you for highlighting both the disturbing situation on many prestigious universities and locally on our campus.

This paragraph resonates deeply:

“We must not underestimate FJP. It is a rabidly antisemitic organization which promotes campus disruptions and vandalism and contributes to the persistent and pervasive antisemitism on our campus. While faculty have freedom to associate with any reprehensible organization they choose and are free to hold the most reprehensible beliefs, they should be held accountable when those beliefs translate into reprehensible acts that violate university rules—and possibly laws. “

Supporting terrorist organizations like Hamas - who killed several Americans and continue to hold five Americans hostage - does raise potential legal issues. Providing financial support for terrorists remains a federal crime. International students violating the visa requirements can face consequences.

A second Trump administration may easily choose to enforce federal immigration laws often currently ignored. They may choose to enforce federal laws against providing material and financial support to international terrorist organizations.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts